Rabu, 26 Mei 2010

Indonesia Country Pluralistic there still!

Of course nothing is not plural in this world. Even the smallest organisms have a plurality of so complicated and it is precisely this that makes life lasts. Because of the complementarity.
However, humans apparently sometimes confused with the diversity and therefore, they love to categorize or define. Giving this definition has been recorded from one century AD. Indian teacher named Charaka has been classified into 340 types of plants and animals of about 200 species. But, the classification is then changed at the time of Aristotle to do research. He classifications based on habitat and form. This then also criticized by the experts afterwards. They argued that human perception is not sufficient to classify organisms based on the form. But then, so increased in number and classification based on various criteria. And because the universe is always growing, there are just new plants and animals. So, new names popping up from different scientists. Then, Linnaeus, who made a natural system of classification based on these organisms, trying to create uniformity. For what? For ease, so the naming is no longer a complicated and have uniformity.
But, what exactly is the standard classification? These standards are always changing. There is no standard for living standard is so complex. Therefore, the classification of Linnaeus also experienced criticism and changes that are not infinite.
This also applies to morality. What is right and wrong for humans? If associated with animal and plant species can have extraordinary dynamics, which is associated with any human being so they should.
Therefore, if we study the ancient religions of the past until now, we'll see changes
dogma. In some African and ancient Egyptian religion, for example, incestuous marriages among the nobility considered sacred and must be done. What underlies this rule? Is the desire of the authorities to save power and wealth in their family environment.
But, what happens then? The discovery reveals that incest is not sacred, but resulted in catastrophe. Children of men most likely the result of incestuous marriages will suffer disability. By subsequent religions, incest is forbidden.
Therefore, subsequent religions even forbid incest, for the sake of human survival itself. So, the religion which he said for the good of mankind, would not want to have to follow economic activity and the dynamics of the universe and living things. He can not escape from criticism. Desecration of religious law would only restrict the plurality of Indonesian state itself. This is what will bring calamity calamity later.
By: Tjen Marching Soe.

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar